Comments on: Jim Mirkalami Update 2: Small Claims Court $10000

By: Pablo Stenehjem

Pablo Stenehjem — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 05:50:04 +0000

Someone necessarily help to make seriously posts I would state. That is the very first time I frequented your website page and so far? I amazed with the analysis you made to create this actual publish amazing. Magnificent task! - Pick Escorts, 25, 10 John Adam Street, London, WC2N 6HA, 020 3468 2199

By: Adrian Paez

Adrian Paez — Wed, 21 Mar 2012 04:22:59 +0000

you are actually a excellent webmaster. The website loading speed is incredible. It seems that you are doing any unique trick. Furthermore, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve done a excellent process in this subject! SM London escorts, 69 Jermyn Street, London, SW1Y 6NY, 020 3011 2642

By: Willis Leehan

Willis Leehan — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:04:49 +0000

You made an excellent point with what you explained. A great number of people should read your article to allow them to have a greater point of view about this topic. It was fantastic of you to provide great details and supporting justifications. After reading this, I know my mind is extremely certain about the issue. Keep up the truly amazing work!

By: Hip Surgery Game

Hip Surgery Game — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:20:50 +0000

Great Post Of The Day 02-02-2010…

And the winner of top post of the day is presented to……

By: warmedfawn

warmedfawn — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:57:19 +0000

Quoted from “Sujoy”

I am actually one who wants to avoid any kind of controversy or confusion or both. Lately he’s been mailing me saying that the usage of the name”Jim Mirkalami ” is totaly illegal, as he believes it’s a one in a zillion name. WTF?
This is what he wrote in the mail.
“Since there is only one (1) Jim Mirkalami in this universe and that is “I”, I do have exclusive right to this name and its use.”

Although he says he may have exclusive right to his name, its not the its trademarked now is it? nore would merely saying it be cause for a lawsuit nessisarily.

*sigh* anyway goodluck

By: Chris Hartjes

Chris Hartjes — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:26:38 +0000

@Paul

I used to work for a company that was located near West Beaver Creek Road up in Richmond Hill, Ontario. It’s for real…well, the address anyway.

By: Christian

Christian — Mon, 05 May 2008 09:59:15 +0000

If I were you I would not try to cross the border to Canada anytime soon. ;-)

By: luke

luke — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:57:11 +0000

Sujoy, I do understand why you would delete them. Not deleting them is going to cause me inconvenience.

The thing with deleting information that has been available on the internet is that often other people have copies and caches that live on. Your deleted posts have been reposted by somebody here: http://fartego.blogspot.com/2008/04/story-of-jim-mirkalami-single-dad.html

By: Sujoy

Sujoy — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:08:05 +0000

Hi Luke,

I have also been one of those ‘lucky’ bloggers been followed by this fanboy Mirkalami. I did two posts on his actions. They are here and here.

And this is why he wants to go on a rampage to sue us. ROTFL.

I really want to publish all the emails, but I seriously would like to know if you are aware of its degree of “fakeness”. Coz, he seems to be quite regular in explaining his side of the story.

Regards,
Sujoy

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 01:11:42 +0000

Yeah, I am pretty sure that emailing a PDF of the claim doesn’t count as service under Rule 8.02.

His 8A Affidavit of Service should be interesting - “I swear that I put the dokument in a scanner thing and then posted it via the intertubes to Mr Welling. Sorry I can’t be more specific, I am not very internet savey”.

Further, his 11A Affidavit of Jurisdiction is going to be even more interesting - the issue of where something published on the internet “takes place” for jurisdictional purposes is very complex - I can’t wait to see the Ontario Small Claims Court grapple with that one - assisted by Mr Mirkalami QC of course.

Unfortunately, he may eventually serve you properly, and then you will have to deal with it. Of course, you could take a trip to Canada, win, then get costs for disbursments under R19.01, inconvenience under R19.05 plus a penalty against him under R19.06 for acting unreasonably.

Or you could just ignore it - $10,000 Canadian dollars is only about $25 US dollars anyway isn’t it?

Oh, and he supposedly lives on West Beaver Creek Road - are you sure this isn’t an elaborate April Fools joke?